Report District Evaluation Composites, District Davidson County, Test CTE Concentrators
| 2022-2023 Composite Trends | ||
|---|---|---|
| Composite Type | One-Year Trend* | |
| Index | Effectiveness Level | |
| Overall | -5.37 | 1 |
| Literacy and Numeracy | -2.83 | 1 |
| Literacy | -0.85 | 3 |
| Numeracy | -2.79 | 1 |
| Science | -1.07 | 2 |
| Social Studies | -4.83 | 1 |
*Year Trend
Educators using district composites for the growth component in the Tennessee Educator Acceleration Model (TEAM) select a district composite from the available options; all district composites use data from the most recent year (2022-23).TDOE Policy
District TVAAS Composites are scores that assess growth at the district level. For 2022-23, district composites are used for the evaluation of educators who require district reporting. Scores will be reported on a 1-5 scale. The table above reports the 2022-23 district composites.
Note: The subjects listed for the CTE concentrator and CTE student composite include all the EOC subjects with value-added estimates. Some of these subjects might be excluded from CTE concentrator and CTE student composite if there were not enough CTE participants to produce a reliable estimate.
Science and Social Studies are listed as subjects that might be included in the composite, but they are not included for grade 3.
| Descriptions of Composite Types | ||
|---|---|---|
| Composite Type | Composite Might Include | |
| Test | Subject | |
| Overall | EOC | Algebra I, Algebra II, Biology I, English I, English II, Geometry, Integrated Math I, Integrated Math II, Integrated Math III, U.S. History |
| Literacy and Numeracy | EOC | Algebra I, Algebra II, English I, English II, Geometry, Integrated Math I, Integrated Math II, Integrated Math III |
| Literacy | EOC | English I, English II |
| Numeracy | EOC | Algebra I, Algebra II, Geometry, Integrated Math I, Integrated Math II, Integrated Math III |
| Science | EOC | Biology I |
| Social Studies | EOC | U.S. History |
| Rules for Determining Effectiveness Level |
| Level 5, Most Effective: Significant evidence that the district's students made more growth than expected (the district's index is 2 or greater). |
| Level 4, Above Average Effectiveness: Moderate evidence that the district's students made more growth than expected (the district's index is between 1 and 2). |
| Level 3, Average Effectiveness: Evidence that the district's students made growth as expected (the district's index is between -1 and 1). |
| Level 2, Approaching Average Effectiveness: Moderate evidence that the district's students made less growth than expected (the district's index is between -2 and -1). |
| Level 1, Least Effective: Significant evidence that the district's students made less growth than expected (the district's index is less than -2). |
| Note: When an index falls exactly on the boundary between two levels, the higher level is assigned. |