Report District Evaluation Composites, District Davidson County, Test CTE Concentrators
2023-2024 Composite Trends | ||
---|---|---|
Composite Type | One-Year Trend* | |
Index | Effectiveness Level | |
Overall | -3.74 | 1 |
Literacy and Numeracy | -0.89 | 3 |
Literacy | 1.30 | 4 |
Numeracy | -1.08 | 2 |
Science | -1.57 | 2 |
Social Studies | -4.71 | 1 |
*Year Trend
Educators using district composites for the growth component in the Tennessee Educator Acceleration Model (TEAM) select a district composite from the available options; all district composites use data from the most recent year (2023-24).TDOE Policy
District TVAAS Composites are scores that assess growth at the district level. For 2023-24, district composites are used for the evaluation of educators who require district reporting. Scores will be reported on a 1-5 scale. The table above reports the 2023-24 district composites.
Note: The subjects listed for the CTE concentrator and CTE student composite include all the EOC subjects with value-added estimates. Some of these subjects might be excluded from CTE concentrator and CTE student composite if there were not enough CTE participants to produce a reliable estimate.
Science and Social Studies are listed as subjects that might be included in the composite, but they are not included for grade 3.
Descriptions of Composite Types | ||
---|---|---|
Composite Type | Composite Might Include | |
Test | Subject | |
Overall | EOC | Algebra I, Algebra II, Biology I, English I, English II, Geometry, Integrated Math I, Integrated Math II, Integrated Math III, U.S. History |
Literacy and Numeracy | EOC | Algebra I, Algebra II, English I, English II, Geometry, Integrated Math I, Integrated Math II, Integrated Math III |
Literacy | EOC | English I, English II |
Numeracy | EOC | Algebra I, Algebra II, Geometry, Integrated Math I, Integrated Math II, Integrated Math III |
Science | EOC | Biology I |
Social Studies | EOC | U.S. History |
Rules for Determining Effectiveness Level |
Level 5, Most Effective: Significant evidence that the district's students made more growth than expected (the district's index is 2 or greater). |
Level 4, Above Average Effectiveness: Moderate evidence that the district's students made more growth than expected (the district's index is between 1 and 2). |
Level 3, Average Effectiveness: Evidence that the district's students made growth as expected (the district's index is between -1 and 1). |
Level 2, Approaching Average Effectiveness: Moderate evidence that the district's students made less growth than expected (the district's index is between -2 and -1). |
Level 1, Least Effective: Significant evidence that the district's students made less growth than expected (the district's index is less than -2). |
Note: When an index falls exactly on the boundary between two levels, the higher level is assigned. |