Report District Evaluation Composites, District Rutherford County, Test TCAP (Grades 4-8)/EOC
|2021-2022 Composite Trends|
|Composite Type||One-Year Trend*|
|Literacy and Numeracy||4.70||5|
*Year TrendEducators using district composites for the growth component in the Tennessee Educator Acceleration Model (TEAM) select a district composite from the available options; all district composites use data from the most recent year (2021-22).
District TVAAS Composites are scores that assess growth at the district level. For 2021-22, district composites are used for the evaluation of educators who require district reporting. Scores will be reported on a 1-5 scale. The table above reports the 2021-22 district composites.
Note: The subjects listed for the CTE concentrator and CTE student composite include all the EOC subjects with value-added estimates. Some of these subjects might be excluded from CTE concentrator and CTE student composite if there were not enough CTE participants to produce a reliable estimate.
Science and Social Studies are listed as subjects that might be included in the composite, but they are not included for grade 3.
|Descriptions of Composite Types|
|Composite Type||Composite Might Include|
|Overall||Grades 3-8||English Language Arts, Math, Science, Social Studies|
|EOC||Biology I, English I, English II, Integrated Math I, Integrated Math II, Integrated Math III, U.S. History|
|Literacy and Numeracy||Grades 3-8||English Language Arts, Math|
|EOC||English I, English II, Integrated Math I, Integrated Math II, Integrated Math III|
|Literacy||Grades 3-8||English Language Arts|
|EOC||English I, English II|
|EOC||Integrated Math I, Integrated Math II, Integrated Math III|
|Social Studies||Grades 3-8||Social Studies|
|Rules for Determining Effectiveness Level|
|Level 5, Most Effective: Significant evidence that the district's students made more growth than expected (the district's index is 2 or greater).|
|Level 4, Above Average Effectiveness: Moderate evidence that the district's students made more growth than expected (the district's index is between 1 and 2).|
|Level 3, Average Effectiveness: Evidence that the district's students made growth as expected (the district's index is between -1 and 1).|
|Level 2, Approaching Average Effectiveness: Moderate evidence that the district's students made less growth than expected (the district's index is between -2 and -1).|
|Level 1, Least Effective: Significant evidence that the district's students made less growth than expected (the district's index is less than -2).|
|Note: When an index falls exactly on the boundary between two levels, the higher level is assigned.|