TVAAS
SearchContact UsSign In

Report District Evaluation Composites, District McMinn County, Test CTE Concentrators

2018-2019 Composite Trends
Composite TypeOne-Year Trend*
IndexEffectiveness Level
Overall-0.053
Literacy and Numeracy-1.122
Literacy0.853
Numeracy-1.242
Social Studies0.953
*Year Trend
Educators using district composites for the growth component in the Tennessee Educator Acceleration Model (TEAM) select a district composite from the available options; all district composites use data from the most recent year (2018-19).

TDOE Policy
District TVAAS Composites are scores that assess growth at the district level. For 2018-19, district composites are used for the evaluation of educators who require district reporting. Scores will be reported on a 1-5 scale. The table above reports the 2018-19 district composites.

Note: The subjects listed for the CTE concentrator and CTE student composite include all the EOC subjects with value-added estimates. Some of these subjects might be excluded from CTE concentrator and CTE student composite if there were not enough CTE participants to produce a reliable estimate.

Descriptions of Composite Types
Composite TypeComposite Might Include
TestSubject
OverallEOCAlgebra I, Algebra II, English I, English II, Geometry, U.S. History
Literacy and NumeracyEOCAlgebra I, Algebra II, English I, English II, Geometry
LiteracyEOCEnglish I, English II
NumeracyEOCAlgebra I, Algebra II, Geometry
Social StudiesEOCU.S. History
Rules for Determining Effectiveness Level
Level 5, Most Effective: Significant evidence that the district's students made more growth than expected (the district's index is 2 or greater).
Level 4, Above Average Effectiveness: Moderate evidence that the district's students made more growth than expected (the district's index is between 1 and 2).
Level 3, Average Effectiveness: Evidence that the district's students made growth as expected (the district's index is between -1 and 1).
Level 2, Approaching Average Effectiveness: Moderate evidence that the district's students made less growth than expected (the district's index is between -2 and -1).
Level 1, Least Effective: Significant evidence that the district's students made less growth than expected (the district's index is less than -2).
Note: When an index falls exactly on the boundary between two levels, the higher level is assigned.